Communicative Interaction for the Construction of the Wasteland in Postconflict´s Colombia


  • Henry Esaú Tibatá Barreto
  • Doris Lilia Torres Cruz


Language, TAC, Wasteland, ACD, LEEN, Rabanal


The objective of this article is to present the partial results found in the analysis of the narratives, made by the actors of the Rabanal wasteland, based on the communicative interaction, from the Theory of communicative action proposed by Habermas, Jüngen(Habermas, 1981 ). In this sense, this research assumed that the TAC is the interaction that actors perform for social construction, based on language. Likewise, in the methodological process three stages were developed: descriptive, analytical and interpretative; considering the postulates raised by the critical analysis of discourse from the critical-social perspective proposed by Neyla Pardo. It stands out in this research that the discourse that is built around the Rabanal wasteland is polysemic and ambiguous and does not favor consensus.


• Alsina, M. (1999). Intercultural communication. Barcelona. Anthropos Editorial.

• Bokser, M. (2002). Illegitimate legalities: human rights and social practices. Ediciones Colihue. Buenos Aires.

• Bouveresse, J. (2000). Wittgenstein Modernity, Progress and Decadence. Mexico: Philosophical Research Institute.

• Cárdenas Páez, A. (2012). "Language, Meaning and culture". In press group and publications UPTC (Ed.) Readings and Scriptures. Doctoral Lessons (pp. 39-68) . Colombia: printing and publishing group UPTC.

• Carrero, V., Soriano, R. M., & Trinidad, A. (2012). Grounded Theory. Grounder Theory. Montalbán: CIS.

• Gadamer, H. (1986). Truth and Method II. Ediciones sígueme Salamanca. Spain.

• García C. (2001). Communication skills in the Spanish Language. Ministry of Communication, Culture and Sports. Madrid

• Grillo, M., Berti, S., & Rizzo, A. (1999). Local Discourses: th new and the old, the public and the private.

• González, M . (2002). “Ethical aspects of qualitative researchâ€. Ethics and university education 29 (may).

• Habermas, J. (1988). The logic of social sciences. Madrid: Tecnos. S.A

• Habermas, J. (1982). Knowledge and Interest. Madrid: Taurus.

• Habermas, J. (2008). Theory of Communicative Action, I. Mexico: Taurus.

• Habermas, J. (2008). Theory of Communicative Action, II. Mexico : Taurus.

• Habermas, J. (2011). Theory of Communicative Action: Complements and Previous Studies. Madrid: Cátedra.

• Habermas, J. (2002). Truth and Justification. España: Trotta.

• Hernandez Sampieri, R. (2003). Research Methodology. México: Mc Graw Hill.

• Hoyos, Guillermo y Uribe, Ãngela. (1998). Convergence between ethics and politics. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores.

• Leff, E. (2004). Environmental Rationality. México: Siglo XXI editores, s.a, de c.v.

• López, J. L., & Lizaga, L. d. (2008). Communicative Reason and Democratic legitimacy. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

• Mairal, R., Peña, S., Cortes, F., & Ruiz, F. (2012). Linguistic Theory. Methods, Tools, and Paradigms. España: universitaria Ramon Areces.

• Marcuse, H. (1954). The One-Dimensional Man. Essay on the Ideology of The Advanced Industrial Society. España: Ariel.

• Martínez Ferro (2013). Legitimacy, reason and right; two models of justification of political power: Universidad externado de Colombia.

• Macías, Cortés. (2003). “Theories of group communication in decision making: context and characterizationâ€. (Doctoral Thesis. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Comunicació Audiovisual i de Publicitat).

• Páez Días, L. (2001). The Frankfurt School. Critical theory of the Society. Essays and Texts. México: Unam .

• Pardo Abril, N. (2001). Habermas: A Proposal for Modern Linguistic Theory. Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

• Pardo Abril, N. (2013). “How to make critical analysis of discourse: a Latin American perspective†Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá.

• Proyecto Páramo Andino “PPA†(2015). Rabanal Wasteland Retrieved at

• Ridao S (2007). Pragmalinguistic Analysis of Conflict Resolutions. Labor Mediations. Universidad de Almería. Almería

• Rojas Soriano, R. (2006). Guide to realice social investigations. Plaza y Valdés S.A de C.V. México.

• Rojas Soriano, R. (2002). Social investigation: theory and praxis. Plaza y Valdés S.A de C.V. México

• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2003). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Barcelona España: Gedisa, S.A.

• Schütz, A. (2003). Social realiby problem. Madrid: Amorroutu Ediciones.




How to Cite

Barreto, H. E. T., & Cruz, D. L. T. (2018). Communicative Interaction for the Construction of the Wasteland in Postconflict´s Colombia. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 6(2). Retrieved from