Comparative Identification of Bacterial Quality in liquid Soap between Nasser and European Gaza Hospitals, Khanyounis Governorate

Authors

  • Akram M. Altaher
  • Eslam S. Abdul Ghafoor
  • Walaa I. Amudi
  • Doha Kh. Alderby

Keywords:

Hand washing, Soap, Contamination, Gram positive bacteria, Gaza Strip.

Abstract

Background: Liquid soap used in hospitals dispensers can become contaminated bacteria. Many factors have an effect on the contamination of these dispensers. This study aimed to investigate the bacterial contamination in liquid soaps at hospital environment in Khanyounis Governorate. Methods: A total of 82 liquid soap samples (50.0% them from Nasser hospital and 50.0% from European Gaza Hospital) were collected in sterile cups from the same departments of both hospitals. After that, the cups were transported within one hour of collection to the microbiology laboratory. Bacteriological identification was performed. Collected data, and bacteriological identification results were analyzed by SPSS version 18. Results: In Nasser hospital, only one sample were found colonized by staph aureus, and two samples were found colonized by other staph, While, In European Gaza Hospital, 12 samples were colonized by staph aureus, and 13 samples were colonized by other staph. Open dispenser systems and washing of dispensers with water were directly proportional with bacterial growth in liquid soap among study hospitals environments (p-value = 0.033 & 0.000 respectively). In European Gaza Hospital, the departments with the largest number of contaminated soap samples were the pediatric department (n=6), surgery men department (n=4), surgery women department (n=4), Intimal women department (n=4). Conclusions: The contamination of liquid soap in European Gaza Hospital is attributed to high number of open dispenser systems (27 dispensers) that was observed in its departments, in addition to using of water instead of chlorine bleach for washing the dispensers before putting the new liquid soap. 

References

Joselany, A., Maria A., Maira D., José, C., Paulo, R. Identification of bacterial contamination in liquid soap for hospital use. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011; 45(1):148-55.

Nouira A, Ounis H, Khediri M, Helali R, Bannour W, Njah M. Healthcare workers' hand hygiene: compliance of the recommendations. Tunis Med. 2008; 86(5):451-6.

Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2002; 5:1– 48.

Zeiny M. Sarmad. Isolation of Some Microorganisms from Bar Soaps and Liquid Soaps in Hospital Environments. Iraqi J Pharm Sci . 2009; Vol.18 (1) .

Carrie, Z., Sheri, M., David, M., Michael, D., Charles, G., James, A. Opportunistic Pathogens From Contaminated Bulk Soap on the Hands of Students and Staff in an Elementary School. 1GOJO Industries, Inc., Akron, OH, and The University of Arizona, Tucson. 2009.

Güneş, Ş., Aydan, Ç., and Rıfat, Ö. Bacterial Colonization of Bar Soaps and Liquid Soaps in Hospital Environments: Near East Med Journal. 2003.

Gräf, W., Kersch, D., Scherzer, G. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1988;186(2):166-79. German.

Downloads

How to Cite

Altaher, A. M., Abdul Ghafoor, E. S., Amudi, W. I., & Alderby, D. K. (2016). Comparative Identification of Bacterial Quality in liquid Soap between Nasser and European Gaza Hospitals, Khanyounis Governorate. Asian Journal of Pharmacy, Nursing and Medical Sciences, 4(5). Retrieved from https://www.ajouronline.com/index.php/AJPNMS/article/view/4254

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 5 (2016): October 2016

Section

Articles

License

  • Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
  • It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
  • The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
  • The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  • The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.