Criticality Analysis of Recharge Area In Upper Cisadane Watershed


  • Radius Pranoto Bogor Agricultural University
  • Satyanto K. Saptomo
  • Roh Santoso B. Waspodo


Criticality, recharge area, overlay, scoring, surface runoff, infiltration


The aims of this research were to (1) identify criticality of recharge area; and (2) analyze water balance of Upper Cisadane Watershed. Identification of recharge area criticality refers to regulation of the Minister of Forestry, Republic of Indonesia Number: P.32/MENHUT-II/2009 by scoring and overlaying of slope, soil type, rainfall, and land use map. SCS-CN (Soil Conservation Service-Curve Number) method was used to analyze runoff and infiltration on each level of recharge area criticality. The criticality of recharge area in the Upper Cisadane Watershed in 2006, 2009, and 2013, are: (1) good: 27.4%, 20.3%, 19.9%; normal: 11.9%, 7.8%, 5.6%; (3) ranging critical: 16.4%, 7.5%, 5.4%; (4) rather critical: 25.3%, 25.6%, 30.6%; (5) critical: 15.3%, 22.2%, 21.6%; and (6) very critical: 3.7%, 16.6%, 17%. We concluded that recharge area with good and normal conditions have an infiltration rate more than surface runoff, while the infiltration rate at recharge area with ranging critical, rather critical, critical and very critical condition less than surface runoff that occured in 2006, 2009 and 2013.


Arsyad S. 2006. Soil and Water Conservation. Bogor [ID]: IPB Pr.

Bonta JV. (1997). Determination of watershed curve number using derived distributions. J. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 123(1): 28-36.

Canters F, Chormanski J, Van de Voorde T, Batelaan O. 2006. Effects of Different Methods for Estimating Impervious Surface cover on Runoff Estimation at Recharge Level. In Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal. pp. 557-566.

Dong L, Xiong L, Lall U and Wang J. 2015. The effects of land use change and precipitation change on direct runoff in Wei River watershed, China. J. Water Science & Technology 71(2): 289-295.

Fan F, Deng Y, Hu X and Weng Q. 2013. Estimating composite curve number using an improved SCS-CN method with remotely sensed variables in Guangzhou, China. J. Remote Sens 5(3):1425-1438.

Govers G, Takken I, Helming K. 2000. Soil roughness and overland flow. J Agronomie 20(2):131–146.

Hawkins RH. 1998. Local Sources for Runoff Curve Numbers. In Proceedings of 11th Annual Symposium of the Arizona Hydrological Society, Tucson, USA.

Kumar PS dan Rishi KH. 2013. Simulation of rainfall runoff using SCS-CN and RRL (Case Study Tadepalli Mandal). J. Engineering Research and General Science 1(1) : 1-11.

Luxon N and Pius C. 2013. Validation of the rainfall runoff SCS-CN model in a recharge with limited measured data in Zimbabwe. J. Water Resources and Environmental Engineering 5(6): 295-303.

Melesse AM and Graham WD. 2004. Storm runoff prediction based on a spatially distributed travel time method utilizing remote sensing ang GIS. J. American Water Resources Association 2150: 863-879.

Minister of Forestry 2008. Laporan Akhir Penyusunan Rencana Detil Penanganan Banjir di Wilayah Jabodetabekjur. Balai Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai Citarum-Ciliwung.

Minister of Forestry 2009. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia No: P. 32/Menhut-II/2009. Tata Cara

Penyusunan Rencana Teknik Rehabilitasi Hutan Dan Lahan Daerah Aliran Sungai (RTkRHL-DAS). Jakarta.

Muchena FN. 2008. Indicators for sustainable land management in Kenya’s context. GEF L. Degrad. Focal Area

Indic. ETC-East Africa. Nairobi, Kenya.

Nilda, Adnyana IWS, Merit IN. 2015. Analisis perubahan penggunaan lahan dan dampaknya terhadap hasil air di das cisadane hulu. J. Ecotrophic 9(1): 35-45.

Reshma T, PS Kumar, RK Babu, KS Kumar. 2010. Simulation of runoff in watersheds using SCS-CN and muskingum-cunge methods using remote sensing and geographical information systems. J. Advanced Science and Technology 25: 3-42

Selvam S, Farooq AD, Magesh NS, Singaraja C, Venkatramanan S, Chung SY. 2015. Application of remote sensing and GIS for delineating groundwater recharge potential zones of Kovilpatti Municipality,Tamil Nadu using IF technique. J. Earth Sciences Informatics. pp 1-14.

USDA SCS (United Statis Devolopment of Agricultural-Soil Conservation Service). 2005. National Engineering Handbook Section 4: Hidrology. Washington DC.

USDA (United Statis Devolopment of Agricultural). 1986. Urban hydrology for small Watersheds. TR-55. Second

ed. Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Viji R, Prasanna PR, Ilangovan R. 2015. GIS based SCS-CN method for estimating runoff in Kundahpalam watershed, Nilgries District, Tamilnadu. J. Earth Sciences Research 19(1): 59-64.

Vink APA. 1975. Land Use in Advancing Agriculture. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Watershed Management Institut of Citarum Ciliwung. 2010. Report of Land Use Map, Map of Administration, Map of Soil type in Cisadane Watershed. Bogor [ID]: Minister of Forestry. Directorate General of Management of Citarum-Ciliwung.

Weng Q. 2001. Modeling urban growth effects on surface runoff with the integration of remote sensing and GIS. J.

Environmental Management 28(6): 737-748.

Zhan X dan Huang M-L. 2004. ArcCN-Runoff: An ArcGIS tool for generating curve number and runoff maps. J. Environmental Modelling and Software 19(10): 875-879.




How to Cite

Pranoto, R., Saptomo, S. K., & Waspodo, R. S. B. (2017). Criticality Analysis of Recharge Area In Upper Cisadane Watershed. Asian Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(1). Retrieved from