Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Measure the Scientific Attitude of the Students, and Attitude Gain by the Application of Meaningful Learning Model of David Ausubel in Teaching Physics

Authors

  • Muhammad Safdar Vice Principal, Islamabad Model College for Boys G-6/2, Islamabad
  • Iqbal Shah

Abstract

This research work was undertaken to construct and validate an instrument to measure the scientific attitude of the secondary school students, and to compare the attitude gain through the use of Meaningful learning Model of David Ausubel and traditional method of teaching physics. The research work was carried out for 35 weeks in the physical science classroom and laboratory of Government Comprehensive High School, Jhelum. The data revealed that there is a gain in the affective domain (scientific attitude) of the students in favour of Meaningful learning model. The meaningful learning model allowed the development of attitudes held by pupils simultaneously at various stages of education. These attitudes can be compared at the different stages and can be correlated with their achievement in physics in future studies.

 

References

• Ausubel, D P. (1966). Meaningful Reception Learning and Acquisition of Concepts in Analysis of Concept Learning. New York: Academic Press.

• Ausubel, D P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

• Ausubel, D P. (1977). “Facilitation of meaningful verbal learning in the classroomâ€. Educational Psychologist.1977.

• Ausubel, D P. and Gait, A.J.H. (1968). Retroactive Facilitation in Meaningful Verbal Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 59, No. 4.

• Ausubel, D. (1978). In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics. Review of Educational research, 48.

• Kumar A. (1995). Teaching of Physical Sciences. New Delhi: Anmol Publications Pvt.

• Ma, Xin & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude towards Mathematics and Achievement in Mathematics. A meta-analysis Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Vol.28, No.1

• Novak, J. D. (1984). Application of Advances in Learning Theory Philosophy of Science: The Improvement of Chemistry Teaching. Journal of Chemistry Teaching. 12

• Novak, J. D. (1990). “Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two meta-cognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learningâ€. Instructional Science.1990.

• Pandey, A. (1986). Teaching Style and Concept Attainment in Science. Third survey of Research in education (1978-1983).

• Reid, N. & Skryabina, E. A. (2002). Attitude towards Physics. Research in Science and Technological Education. Vol. 20, No. 1, 2002.

• Reid, N. (2003). Getting started in pedagogical research, LSTN Physical science practical guide, published by LTSN Physical science center, Department of Chemistry, University of Hull.

• Safdar, M. (2010). A comparative study of Ausubelian and Traditional methods of teaching physics at secondary school level in Pakistan. Unpublished Ph.D thesis. Islamabad. National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad.

• Shah, I. (2004). Making University Laboratory Work in Chemistry more Effective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Glasgow: Glasgow University, Scotland.

• Vadidya N. (1996). Science Teaching for the 21st Century. (1st ed). New Delhi: Deep and Deep Publications.

• Zaman. (1996). The Use of an Information Processing Model to Design and evaluate a physics undergraduate laboratory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Glasgow: Glasgow University.

Downloads

Published

2014-02-15

How to Cite

Safdar, M., & Shah, I. (2014). Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Measure the Scientific Attitude of the Students, and Attitude Gain by the Application of Meaningful Learning Model of David Ausubel in Teaching Physics. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from https://www.ajouronline.com/index.php/AJEEL/article/view/805

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014): February 2014

Section

Articles

License

  • Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
  • It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
  • The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
  • The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  • The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.