Experimentation Cooperative Learning Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) Type Viewed From Learning Motivation

Authors

  • Idha Novianti Indonesia Open University

Keywords:

mathematics achievement, Student Team Achievement Division (STAD), conventional, learning motivation

Abstract

Need a way for students to love math, learning models have only focused upon the teacher to make students passive in understanding mathematics. Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) cooperative learning model is expected to provide better learning outcomes. This study is a quasi-experimental study. The study population was all students of class VIII SMP in Surakarta. Sampling was a stratified cluster random sampling. Sample size for this study was 186 students. Data collection method used is the method of documentation, questionnaire method, and the method of testing. There is a preliminary test with the balance test using the t test, and as a prerequisite t test is the test of normality with Lilliefor's test, and the test of homogeneity with Bartlett's test. Techniques of data analysis in this study using two-way Analysis of Variance with unequal cells, a prerequisite analysis using Lilliefor's test for normality test, homogeneity using Bartlett's test, with a significance level (α) = 5%. The result of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) models provides better learning outcomes than conventional learning models on motivation high, medium or low.

Author Biography

Idha Novianti, Indonesia Open University

References

• Amstrong, Scot, Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) in a Twelfth Grade Classroom: Effect on Student Achievement and attitude. Journal and social research. Vol.2, no.7, 1998.

• Arends, Richard, Classroom Instruction and Management. Central Conecticut State University:the McGrow-Hill Companies, 1997.

• Depdiknas, Standar Isi Mata Pelajaran Matematika SMA/MA Kurikulum 2006. BSNP, Jakarta, 2006.

• Herman Hudoyo, Belajar Mengajar Matematika, Depdikbud: P2LPTK, Jakarta, 1998.

• Okezone.com, http://international.okezone.com/read/2013/01/08/373/743021/penyebab-indeks-matematika-siswa-ri-terendah-di-dunia, 2013.

• Pius A. Partanto dan M. Dahlan Al Barry, Kamus Ilmiah Populer, Arkola, Surabaya, 1994.

• Poerwadarminta, W. J. S., Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Rajagrafindo, Jakarta, 1997.

• Ruseffendi, Pengantar Kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA, Tarsito, Bandung, 1991.

• Sardiman A.M., Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2007.

• Slavin, Cooperative Learning, Theory and Practise 4th edition. Allyn and Bacon Publishers, 1995.

• Sumarmo, A., from http://elearning.unesa.ac.id/myblog/alim-sumarno/keefektifan-penerapan-paduan-model-pembelajaran-problem-solving-dan-kooperatif-tipe-stad-untuk-meningkatkan-hasil-belajar-dan-berpikir-kritis, 2011.

• Triluqman, from Belajar dan Motivasinya: www.heritl.blogspot.com, 2007.

• Wardhani, D. S., PAKET FASILITASI PEMBERDAYAAN KKG/MGMP MATEMATIKA, http://p4tkmatematika.org/fasilitasi/13-SI-SKLSMP-Optimalisasi-Tujuan-wardhani.pdf, 2008.

• Winkel, W.S., Psikologi Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Belajar, PT. Gramedia, Jakarta, 1983.

• Zakaria, E., dan Iksan, Z., Promoting Cooperative Learning in Science and Mathematics Education: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, vol. 3, no.1,pp.35-39, 2007.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-13

How to Cite

Novianti, I. (2013). Experimentation Cooperative Learning Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) Type Viewed From Learning Motivation. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 1(5). Retrieved from https://www.ajouronline.com/index.php/AJEEL/article/view/656