Teaching Science at the Primary school Level: “Problems Teachers’ are facing”

Yassanne Marcia Garraway-Lashley

Abstract


This study aimed at ascertaining the problems teachers face teaching science at the primary level. Literature reviewed relating to school science have suggested that students lack interest in science. This lack of interest on the part of the students may be as a result of problems teachers face implementing the science curriculum at the primary level. These problems if not identified may affect the quality of science education. The study was guided by one research question which was further sub- divided into two sub- questions.  A descriptive survey research design was used. A 20 item questionnaire was administered to eighty teachers from ten primary schools from the administrative regions five and six in Guyana. . Validation of the instrument was achieved through the contribution of a science educator from the University of Guyana. A reliability coefficient of 0.77 was obtained using Spearman-Brown split half coefficient. Data collected were analysed using mean and percentages. The finding showed that teachers admitted that they need continuous professional development sessions to enhance their science instruction and science content knowledge. It was therefore recommended that a research study be conducted to ascertain the teachers' specific area of interest for continuous professional development in science education.


Keywords


Primary Education, Problems in Science, Pedagogy, i

Full Text:

PDF

References


• Abell, S. K., and Bryan, L. A. (1999). Development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teachings 36: 121-139.

• Adu-Gyamfi. (2013). Lack of interest in school science among non-science students at the senior high school level: Problems of education in the 21st century. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 53(53), 7-21.

• Akerson, V., &Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1025–1049.

• Allen, R. (2006). Trends in Elementary Science Education. Priorities in Practice: The essential of science, Grades K-6: Effective curriculum, Instruction and Assessment.

• Anderson, C. (2001). Designing systems to support learning science with understanding for all: Developing dialogues among researchers, reformers, and developers (No. available at events/meetings/textbook/science/anderson.htm). Washington, DC: Project 2061.

• Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

• Bandura,A.(1997) Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: WH Freeman and Company

• Bang, E. (2013). Hybrid-mentoring programs for beginning elementary science teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(1), 1-15.

• Barker, S. (2006). Interactive starters and closures for deep learning. Alberta Science Education Journal, 38(1), 3–5.

• Barnett, J., &Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85(4), 426–453

• Bishop, K., and Denley, P. (1997). The fundamental role of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of science. School Science. Review 79: 65-71.

• Buxton, C. (2006). Creating contextually authentic science in a “Low-Performing” urban elementary school. Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 695–721.

• Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving Scientific Literacy, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.

• Carnoy,M. & Arends,F. (2012). Explaining mathematics achievement gains in Botswana and South Africa. Prospects (18Octember, 2012), p-16. Retrieved online: at: doi.1007/s111250129246-6.

• Childs, A., & McNicholl, J. (2007). Science teachers teaching outside of subject specialism: challenges, strategies adopted and implications for initial teacher education. Teacher Development, 11(1), 1-20.

• Cole, D. J., & Buehner-Brent, L., (1991). Collaborative agencies: An essential ingredient for successful science programs. Education, 111, 313-325.

• Crawford, B. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642.

• Czerniak, C. M. (1990). A study of self -efficacy, anxiety, and science knowledge in preservice elementary teachers. Paper presented at the Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta.

• Davis,E.A; Petish,D.;& Smithey;(2006). Challenges new teachers face. Review of Education Research. 76(4), 607-651.

• Deaudelin, C., Lefebvre, S., Brodeur, M., Dussault, M., Richer, J., & Mercier, J. (2005). Évolution des conceptions relatives à l’enseignement, à l’apprentissageet aux technologies de l’information et de la communication chez des enseignants du primaire. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 28(4), 583–614.

• Diakidoy,I.N.& Iordanou,K.(2003). Preservice teachers’ and teachers’ conceptions of energy and their ability to predict pupils’ level of understanding. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 18(4), 357368

• Ding; Doug & Meydan (2007). Difficulties science teacher at the elementary school level experience in science instruction in Turkey. Humanity and Social Science Journal. 2(2), 86-92

• diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

• Ganser, T. (1996). What do mentors say about mentoring? Journal of Staff Development 17: 36-39.

• Garcia, C.(2003). The effects of Teacher Attitude, Experience, and Background Knowledge on the use of inquiry method teaching in the elementary classroom. Retreived from http://www.nmu.edu

• Gecer, A. & Ozel, R. (2012). Elementary Science and Technology Teachers’ Views on Problems Encountered in the Instructional Process. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 12(3)

• Glickman, C. (1991). Pretending not to know what we know. Educational Leadership

• Haladyna; Olsen; & Shaughnessy. (1982). Relationships of student, teacher and learning environment variables to attitudes towards science. Science Education.66, 671-687.

• Harlem; & Holroyd (1997). Primary teachers understanding of concepts of science: impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education. 19(1), 93-105.

• Hashweh, M, Z. (1987). Effects of Subject Matter Knowledge in the Teaching of Biology and Physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3 (2) 109-120.

• Hassard, J.(2012). Do standards impedes Science teaching and learning? In the Art of Teaching Science,

• Haury, D. L., & Rillero, P., (1994). Perspectives of hands-on science teaching. ERIC Clearing house for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.

• Hodson, D. (2002). Countering science reluctance in elementary science education: Contrasting approaches via action research. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(3), 305–320.

• Hudson, P. (2004) Toward Identifying Pedagogical Knowledge for Mentoring in Primary Science Teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2. 215-225Springer. Retrieved at ttp://www.jstor.org/stable/40188783.

• Jarvis,T.;& Pell, A.;(2012).Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during and after a visit to the UK national space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 42(1), 53-83.

• Jarrett, O.S. (1998). Playfulness: A motivator in elementary science teacher preparation. School Science & Mathematics, 98: 181-187.

• Jelinek, D.J (1998). Students’ perceptions of the nature of science and attitudes towards science education in an experiential science program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA(Ed 418875).

• Kelble, E. S., & Howard, R. E., (1994). Enhancing physical science instruction for gifted elementary school students: Developing teacher confidence and skills. Roeper Review, 16, 162-166.

• Kind, V. (2009). A Conflict in your Head: An exploration of trainee science teachers’ subject matter knowledge development and its impact on teacher self- confidence. International Journal of Science Education, 31 (11), 1529-1562.

• Leever. (2010). Case work paper education and skill, campaign for science and engineering in UK. Retrieved from: Hilary@sciencecampaign.org.uk

• Maharaj-Sharma, R. (2012). What are upper primary school students’ perceptions of science? The Trinidad and Tobago context. Caribbean Curriculum. Vol. 19, 91–108.

• Mastropieri, M.A. & Scruggs, T. E., (1994). Text versus hands-on science curriculum. Remedial & Special Education, 15, 72-85.

• McIntyre, P., & Juliebo, M. (1995). The power of kindergarten: Talk at the science centre. Alberta Science Education Journal, 28(2), 16–19.

• McRobbie, C., Ginns, I., & Stein, S. (2000). Preservice primary teachers’ thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 81–101.

• Mellado, V. (1998). The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Education, 82(2), 197-214

• Mizzi,D.(2013). The challenges faced by science teachers when teaching outside their specific science specialism. ActaDidacticaNapocensia. 6(4), 1-4.

• Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2001, September). Pupils’ attitudes, perceptions and understanding of primary science: Comparisons between Northern Irish and English schools. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British

• Educational Research Association, University of Leeds, England.

• Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767–790.

• Obama, B.H. (2009). Remarks by the President at the national academy of science annual meeting, Washington, DC.

• Retrieved from http:// www.whitehouse.gov/the_pres_office/remarks_by_the _president_at_the -National -Academy-of-science Annual-meeting

• Ogunkola, B.J & Samuel, D. (2011). Science Teachers’ and Students perceived difficult topics in the Integrated Science Curriculum of Lower Secondary Schools in Barbados. World Journal of Education, 1(2).

• Olowodunoye, S. (2015). Knowledge sharing behaviour: the role of self-efficacy, organisational justice and organisational tenure. European Scientific Journal.11 (17)

• Patriarca, L. A., and Kragt, D. M. (1986). Teacher expectations and student achievement: The ghost of Christmas future. Curriculum Review 25: 48-50.

• Plourde, L. A., (2002). The influence of student teaching on preservice elementary teachers' science self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29, 245-253.

• Pozo, J.L. (2008); Aprendices y Maestros (Learners and Teachers). Madrid, Alianza.

• Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185–217

• Savery, J & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35, 31-38.

• Shapiro, B. (2006). Professional development in elementary science: New conversations guiding new approaches in teachers’ work and learning. Alberta Science Education Journal, 38(1), 28–31.

• Shapiro, B., & Last, S. (2002). Starting points for transformation: Resources to craft a philosophy to guide professional development in elementary science. In P. Abder-Fraser (ed.), Professional Development of Science Teachers: Local Insights with Lessons for the Global Community, (pp. 1–20). NY: Routledge/Falmer.

• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1–22.

• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4-14

• Silversten, M.L. (1993).State of the art: Transforming ideas for teaching and learning science, a guide for elementary science education. (GPO #065-000-00599-9). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

• Stevens, C, &Wenner, G, (1996). Elementary preservice teachers Knowledge and beliefs regarding science and mathematics. School Science & Mathematics, 96, 2-9.

• Tal, T., Krajcik, J., &Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Urban schools’ teachers enacting project- based science. Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 722–745.

• Tilgner. (1990). Avoiding science in the Elementary school science education. 74(4), 421-431.

• Umoke, T.C; &Nwafor, C.C. (2014). Effects of Instructional simulation on Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Biology. Journal of Education and Practice, 19(5)

• Van Driel, J., Beijaard, D., &Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.

• Vaidya, S. R., (1993). Restructuring elementary and middle school science for improved teaching and learning. Education, 114, 63-70.

• Van Zee, E., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159–190.

• Van Driel,J ., De Jong, O ., & Verloop, N . (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86(4), 572-590.

• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1998). Footnotes to 'The Many Faces of Constructivism.' Educational Researcher, 25: 19.

• Watters J. J. & Ginns, I. S. (2000). Developing motivation to teach elementary science: Effect of collaborative and authentic learning practices in preservice education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4), 277-313.

• William, Y. (2015). Test –retest reliability coefficient. Retrieved from: http://study.com/academy/lesson/test-retest-reliability-coefficient-examples-lesson-quiz.html

• Woodward, A. & David L. E. (1990), Textbook use and teacher professionalism. Textbooks and Schooling in the United States (89th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education), 174-193.

• Wu, Y., & Tsai, C. (2005). Development of elementary school students’ cognitive structures and information processing strategies under long-term constructivist-oriented science instruction. Science Education, 89(5), 822–846.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v7i3.5847

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.