Connecting Graduate Students Across the World With Research Web-Conferences


  • Reima Saado Al-Jarf King Saud University



web-conferences, online training, synchronous online training, electronic searching web-conferences, graduate training, online training workshops


This article describes a series of training web-conferences in which graduate students majoring in linguistics in Australia, UK, USA and Saudi Arabia participated. The web-conferences aimed at developing graduate students’ electronic searching skills in linguistics, to introduce them to latest trends and developments in linguistic research, and to communicate with expert linguists worldwide. They were initiated, organized and hosted by the Saudi Linguists’ Society (SAL) created a Saudi graduate student studying in the U.K. Since SAL has a limited budget, free web-conferencing software, such as PalTalk, Skype, How-to Geek and WEbex, were tried out.  Graduate students could register in the web-conferences for free. SAL’s web-conferencing coordinator who was a graduate student in Australia invited the speakers, selected the web-conferencing theme, prepared the web-conference poster, announced them in the SAL website and on its Facebook page, scheduled them, and registered the participants. Steps in preparing for and conducting the training web-conferences are given. Participants’ views on the benefits and shortcomings of training web-conferences are reporte,and recommendations for conducting effective training web-conferences and for extending free web-conferencing and webinar tools to other educational settings in Saudi Arabia are given. In general, the participants found the training web-conferences cost-effective and beneficial.

Author Biography

Reima Saado Al-Jarf, King Saud University

Prof. Al-Jarf has taught ESL, ESP and translation for 26 years. She has 600 publications and conference presentations in 70 countries.


Angeli, C., Valanides, N. & Bonk, C. J. (2003). Communication in a web-based conferencing system: The quality of computer-mediated interactions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 31-43 Jan 2003.

Artino, A. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260-270.

Bandy, J. (2010). When should you offer online training? Performance Improvement, 49(1), 5-6.

Bower, M. & Hedberg, J. (2010). A quantitative multimodal discourse analysis of teaching and learning in a web-conferencing environment--the efficacy of student-centered learning designs. Computers & Education, 54, 2, 462-478.

Cereijo, M. (2006). Attitude as predictor of success in online training. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(4), 623-639.

Chapman, C. & Knapczyk, D.(2003).Integrating web conferencing and field work for preparing rural special educators. ERIC Document No. ED476217

Coffey, J. (2010). Web conferencing software in university-level, e-learning-based, technical courses. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 38(3), 367-381.

Contreras, M. & Dolan, M. (2006). Participant interaction in a Latin American online leadership training course. INDES Working Paper Series. ERIC Document No. ED493784

Curran, V., Kirby, F., Parsons, E. & Lockyer, J. (2003). Discourse analysis of computer-mediated conferencing in world wide web-based continuing medical education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 23(4), 229-238.

Daytner, G., Robinson, L., Schneider, C. & Johanson, J. (2009). Online teacher training: the early childhood technology integrated instructional system--Phase 3. ERIC Document No. ED508427

Doo, M. (2006). A problem in online interpersonal skills training: Do learners practice skills? Open Learning, 21(3), 263-272.

Foreman, J. & Jenkins, R.(2005). Full-featured web conferencing systems. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 1(4).

Forrester, D. (2009). Global connections: Web conferencing tools help educators collaborate anytime, anywhere. Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(5), 24-25.

Fridrici, M. & Lohaus, A. (2009). Stress-prevention in secondary schools: online- versus face-to-face-training. Health Education, 109(4), 299-313.

Ghosh, R. & Githens, R. (2011). Online contract training: Applying organization theory to reconcile competing missions within community colleges. Human Resource Development Review, 10(2), 180-197.

Grant, A. (2009). Webinars at Louisiana virtual school. Principal Leadership, 9 (9), 64-66.

Hartsell, T. &Yuen, S. (2006). Video streaming in online learning. AACE Journal, 14(1), 31-43.

Johnson, E., Bishop, A., Holt, A., Stirling, J. & Zane, J. (2001). Reflections in cyberspace: Web conferencing for language teacher education. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 169-86.

Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., Williams, J. & Donelan, H. (2012). Web conferencing for synchronous online tutorials: Perspectives of tutors using a new medium. Computers & Education, 58(3), 953-963.

Kingery, R. (2009). Factors predicting nonprofit employees' likelihood of attending online training. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Louisville. ERIC Document No. ED515768

Knapczyk, D., Frey, T. & Wall-Marencik, W. (2005). An evaluation of web conferencing in online teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28(2), 114-124.

Kokoc, M., Ozlu, A., Cimer, A. & Karal, H. (2011). Teachers' views on the potential use of online in-service education and training activities. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(4), 68-87.

Lin, S. & Chiu, C. (2008). Incentive styles, asynchronous online discussion, and vocational training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(4), 363-377.

Long, L., Dubois, C. & Faley, R. (2009). A case study analysis of factors that influence attrition rates in voluntary online training programs. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(3), 347-359.

Loudon, M. & Sharp, M. (2006). Online class review: Using streaming-media technology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(3), 39-43.

Montgomery, S. (2009). Online Webinars! Interactive Learning where Our Users Are: The Future of Embedded Librarianship. Public Services Quarterly, 6(2-3), 306-311.

Quilter, S. & Chester, C. (2001). The relationship between web-based conferencing and instructional outcomes. Inter- national Journal of Instructional Media, 28(1), 13-22.

Reushle, S. & Loch, B. (2008). Conducting a trial of web conferencing software: Why, how, and perceptions from the coalface. Journal of Distance Education—TOJDE, 9(3), 19-28. ERIC Document No. ED502083

Seufferheld, M. & Scagnoli, N. (2011). Web conferencing and ICTs to enhance undergraduate science teaching. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8(1), 1-7.

Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Bell, B. & Bauer, K. (2010).The effects of technical difficulties on learning and attrition during online training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(3), 281-292.

Skylar, A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 69-84.

Stephens, K. & Mottet, T. (2008). Interactivity in a web conference training context: Effects on trainers and trainees. Communication Education, 57(1), 88-104.

Supanakorn-Davila, S. & Bolliger, D. (2012). A preliminary evaluation of instructional effectiveness of online training implemented at a government agency in Thailand. International Journal on E-Learning, 11(1), 73-94.

Wolf, P. (2006). Best practices in the training of faculty to teach online. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 17 (2), 47-78.

Wynter-Wellington, S. (2010). An assessment of an interactive online training course at a placement and business service. Ed.D. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University. ERIC Document No. ED518812.




How to Cite

Al-Jarf, R. S. (2018). Connecting Graduate Students Across the World With Research Web-Conferences. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 6(5).