Do Post-Reading-Questions in EFL / ESL Reading Textbooks Improve Cognitive Skills?

Authors

  • Chiharu Nakanishi Kunitachi College of Music
  • Kaori Ando
  • Hodaka Nakanishi
  • Rie Suzuki

Keywords:

cognitive processes, Bloom’s revised taxonomy, lower- / higher-order thinking skills, post-reading questions

Abstract

In the present study we investigate the characteristics of post-reading questions in EFL / ESL reading textbooks for lower English proficiency students. Two types of textbooks were compared using Bloom’s Revised taxonomy. One type aims at improving not only learners’ English skills but also enhancing their critical thinking skills whereas the other type intend to improve learners’ reading skills as well as their English skills. The focus of this investigation is on whether there are any differences in the cognitive skills that learners are expected to employ while using these textbooks and if so how they differ. The results illustrate that the two types of textbooks actually show different patterns of usage in the cognitive process. While the cognitive skills enhancing textbooks use a variety of cognitive processes (12 of 19 subcategories), the reading skills textbooks use only 7 of them. As reading skills textbooks are widely used at university in Japan, teachers who would like to develop a wider variety of cognitive skills have to prepare additional / other questions when the questions in textbooks seem insufficient for the purpose. One of the teaching implications from this study is the use of the first language and short answer questions.

Author Biography

Chiharu Nakanishi, Kunitachi College of Music

Department of Music

References

OECD. “21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries, EDU Working paper†no. 41. 2009. Retrieved fromhttp://www.oecd.org/officialdocu ments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/W -KP(2009)20-&doclanguage=en,

Takeo Tanaka. “Yoi hatsumon, warui hatsumon: jyugyo wo kaeru hatsumonn towa†[Good questions and bad questions: what are the questions to change classrooms]. Eigo Kyoiku, 59 (1), 10-13. 2010.

Takeo Tanaka & Chisato Tanaka, “Eigo Kyoshi no tameno Hatsumon Technique†[Designing of English classrooms: Reading Comprehenshion, Focusiong on the quesiotns] Tokyo: Taishukan shoten. 2009.

Seiji Fukazawa, “Dokkai wo sokushin-suru hatsumon zukuri no jyuyosei – Koto gakko eigo reading kyokashochu no setsumon-bunseki wo toshite†[Significance of Designing Questions to Enhance Reading Comprehension: Through the analysis of post-reading questions in senior high school English textbooks in Japan]. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University. Part. II. 57, 169-176. 2008.

Seiko Hirai (Ed.), “A Study of language education based on the theories of bilingualism: the effectiveness of CALP-oriented teaching methodologies†Report on study 23520699 Grants-in Aid for Scientific Research C. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science(JSPS), 2014.

Lorin W. Anderson and David R. Krathwohl (Eds.), “A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition†New York: Longman. 2001.

Benjamin S. Bloom, Max D. Engelhart, Edward J. Furst, Walker H. Hill, & David R. Krathwohl “Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain†New York: David McKay Company. 1956.

Takeo Tanaka, Katsumasa Shimada & Hiroyuki Kondo, “Suiron hatsumon wo tori ireta eigo reading shidoâ€[English Reading Guidance for Incorporating Inferential Questions] Sanseido Co Ltd., 74-87, 2015

Yoshio Katayama, Eiichi Endo, Akira Sasaki & Mikio Matsumura, “Shin eigo ka kyouiku no kenkyu†[New Study on English Education]. Taishukan Publishing Co., Ltd, 1994.

Tom Hutchinson, Alan Waters, English for Specific Purposes, Cambridge University Press, 1987

Carl B, Smith, Dorra M. Ellis and Eugene Read, “The Importance of Expository Text: Reading and Writingâ€. Retrieved form https://files.eFric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED480886.pdf (Viewed on 17th of February, 2018)

Ronald B. Gillam, Elizabeth D. Pena & Lynda Miler, “Dynamic Assessment of Narrative and Expository Discourseâ€, Bulletin of the Topics in Language Discourse; Research Library 33-47, Nov.,1999.

Anne P. Sweet and Catherine E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension. New York: Guilford. 2003

IT Training Services, Penn State University 2017, Writing Effective Quiz Questions. Retrieved from http://personal.psu.edu/bxb11/QuizQuestions/QuizQuestions_print.html (Viewed on 17th of February, 2018)

Tsuneo Takahashi & Masao Takahashi, “Eigo reading shido no kiso†[Basics of Teaching English Reading]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha. 1987

Downloads

Published

2018-04-21

How to Cite

Nakanishi, C., Ando, K., Nakanishi, H., & Suzuki, R. (2018). Do Post-Reading-Questions in EFL / ESL Reading Textbooks Improve Cognitive Skills?. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 6(2). Retrieved from https://www.ajouronline.com/index.php/AJEEL/article/view/5253

Issue

Section

Articles