Comparative Study of Ultimate Moment and Cost by using ACI 318-08, BS 8110-1:1997 and IS 456:2000

Authors

  • Adkins Robinson S.A. Engineering College
  • Thirumalini Perumal Vellore Institute of technology

Keywords:

Ultimate moment, ACI 318-08, BS 8110-1, 1997 and IS 456, 2000

Abstract

When designing a safe and economical structure, the ultimate moment a rectangular beam defines the strength of the structure. By considering the above needs, this study gives the comparative design of ultimate moment of a rectangular beam by using three different international design codes. The reduction factor used differs for different codes which affects the strength of the flexural member. The design data obtained from a particular design is used in other standards to bring out similar results. The design methodology is quite similar, but there are some differences in the parameters and constants mentioned in the three code provisions. The cost is estimated to ensure an economical design.

Author Biographies

Adkins Robinson, S.A. Engineering College

UG Student, Department of Civil Engineering and S.A. Engineering college

Thirumalini Perumal, Vellore Institute of technology

Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering and Vellore Institute of technology

References

Chanakya Arya, Design of structural elements: Concrete, Steelwork, Masonry and Timber Designs to British Standards and Euro codes, Third edition, CRC Press, 2009.

Matthew W. Roberts, CEE 3150 – Reinforced Concrete Design Course wares, University of Wisconsin - Platteville and The Board of Regents Wisconsin system, 2009.

American Concrete Institute (2008). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI 318M-08, USA.

BS 8110 – 1:1997, Structural use of concrete — Part 1: Design charts for singly reinforced beams, doubly reinforced beams and rectangular columns.

IS 456:2000, Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced Concrete — Code of Practice.

P.C. Varghese, Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete, Second edition, PHI learning private limited, September 2013.

Anupam Sharma and Dr. Suresh Singh Kushwah, “Comparative Analysis of Reinforcement and Prestressed Concrete Beamsâ€, International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp.2564-2566, August 2015.

Bhavin H. Zaveri, Jasmin A. Gadhiya, Hitesh K. Dhameliya, “A Review on the Comparative Study of Steel, RCC and Composite Buildingâ€, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp 354-365, January 2016.

K. H. Bayagoob, Yavuz Yardim, S. A. Ramoda, “Design Chart for Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Sectionâ€, 2 nd International Balkans Conference on Challenges of Civil Engineering, BCCCE, 23-25 May 2013, Epoka University, Tirana, Albania.

Morteza Fadaee, Atefeh Iranmanesh, and Mohammad J. Fadaee, “A Simplified Method for Designing RC Slabs under Concentrated Loadingâ€, IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp 675-679, December 2013.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-16

How to Cite

Robinson, A., & Perumal, T. (2016). Comparative Study of Ultimate Moment and Cost by using ACI 318-08, BS 8110-1:1997 and IS 456:2000. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(3). Retrieved from https://www.ajouronline.com/index.php/AJAS/article/view/3778

Issue

Section

Articles