Environmental Insurance Model in the Shipyard Industry

Achmad Budiyanto, Haryoto Kusnoputranto, R. Sjarief Didjaja, Fatma Lestari

Abstract


The shipyard industry is a capital- and labour-intensive industry, which also supports Indonesia’s industrial development. In carrying out its activities, which include shipbuilding and ship repair works, the shipyard industry is challenged by a number of risks, one of the crucial ones being the risk of deterioration of the shipyard environmental quality due to the great number of ships repaired in the docks. Risk management practice in the Shipyard Industry involves transferring risks to manage potential environmental risk threats through the use of Environmental Insurance. Environmental risk transfer analysis is determined by risk analysis factors (risk values), risk estimates (risk characteristics), and environmental insurance modeling (preventive cost & risk-based margin) using SAST (Strategic Assumption Surfacing and Testing) and PPA (Participatory Perspectives Analysis) methods. The results demonstrate that the biggest risk factor – also a driving factor – is the risk of shipyard contamination due to the sandblasting process in a series of activities in ship repair, followed by leverage factors, which are paint wastes, rust, barnacles, and others. The most suitable progressive environmental insurance model for environmental risk transfer within the scope of ship repair suggests the installation of environmentally friendly docks, namely Graving Docks. Water blasting, the use of environmentally friendly anti-fouling paints, or charging preventive costs to stakeholders may be calculated based on the Environmental Insurance premium calculation formula and are charged to ships repaired on such docks.

Keywords


, risk management, environmental risk, environmental insurance modeling

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abelson, N., Emerging options in environmental insurance. Plants, Sites and Parks,. 2003/2004; 30, 4; ProQuest pg. 10, 2004

Alviggi, Christopher; Avena, Suzanne M, Esq., Using environmental insurance to overcome credit risk, American Agent & Broker; Dec 2008; 80, 12; ABI/INFORM Complete pg. 32, 2008

Amarandos, A. and D. Strauss, Environmental Insurance as a Risk Management Tool, Natural Resource & Environment, 15: 88-91, 133-134, Avalaible from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40924029 [Accessed 30 May 2013), 2000.

Basuki, M. and S. Widjaja, Studi pengembangan model manajemen risiko usaha bangunan baru pada industri galangan kapal, Jurnal Universitas Islam Indonesia, Avalaible from: http://journal.uii.ac.id/index.php/Teknoin/article/viewFile/2106/1912 [Accesed September 2012], 2012.

Bourgeois, R. and F Jesus, Participatory Prospective Analysis, Exploring and Anticipating Challenges with Stakeholders, Center for Allevation of Poverty through Secondary Crops Development in Asia and The Pasific and French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development, Monograph, 2004.

Krozer, J., Mass K., Kothuis, B., Demonstration of Environmentally Sound and Cost-effective Shipping, Journal of Cleaner Production, www.cleanerproduction.net, 2003.

Lee, E, Shin, JG and Y. Park, A Statistical Analysis of Engineering Project Risk in the Korean Shipbuilding Industry, Journal Ship Production, 23: 223-230, 2007.

Mason RO, Mitroff II, Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory, Cases and Techniques, New York, Willey, 1981.

Pritchard, William G, Jr., The changing world of environmental insurance, American Agent & Broker; Feb 2004; 76, 2; ABI/INFORM Complete pg. 24, 2004.

The Australian New Zealand Risk Management Standard, AS/NZS 4360, 1999.

Widjaja, S., Traning Awareness Manajemen Risiko PT DOK dan Perkapalan Surabaya, PT DOK dan Perkapalan, Surabaya, 2008.

Widjaja, S., Rancangan Kebijakan Dasar Sistem Manajemen Risiko PT DOK dan Perkapalan Surabaya, PT DOK dan Perkapalan, Surabaya, 2008.

Zinkiewicz, P., New environmental insurance coverage abounds, World Wastes 36, 4: 62, 1993.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.