Physical Characteristics and Proximate Composition of Three Commercial <em>Shrunken 2</em> Varieties of Sweet Corn in the Philippines as Influenced by Harvest Maturity


  • Gemaima Evangelista University of the Philippines, Philippines
  • Angelina Felix University of the Philippines, Philippines



shrunken 2 sweet corn, harvest maturities, proximate composition, physical characteristics


The physical and proximate characteristics of three commercial varieties of shrunken 2 sweet corn as affected by harvest maturities (18, 20 and 22 days after 100% silking) were evaluated. As sweet corn, there was a significant increase in length in SC1 and SC2. On the other hand all varieties ear diameter increased with maturity. The three varieties have significant differences in ear length and diameter. Lightness of kernels was not affected by maturity and varietal differences. Increasing a* and b* values suggested that the kernels became more red and yellow as they mature on the plant due to carotenogenesis. The a* and b* values of SC1 and SC2 were significantly affected by maturity while SC3 was not. In terms of chroma, only SC2 was significantly affected by harvest maturity, with an increased in color vividness as it matured in the plant. While hue values of the three varieties were not affected by harvest maturity. SC1 and SC2 kernel percentage moisture decreased significantly as sweet corn matures in the plant. Percentage ash content was not significantly affected by harvest maturity. On the other harvest maturity affected SC1 and SC2 percentage protein, but not their fiber content. The percentage fat and nitrogen free extract of SC1 kernel decreased as the plant matures. Mean energy content was significantly different with harvest maturity in all three varieties at a P value < 0.01 (SC1 and SC2) and P = 0.05 (SC3). Harvest maturity affected the physical and proximate composition of the three commercial varieties of shrunken 2 sweet corn in the Philippines.


Alan, O., Kinaci, G., Kinaci, E., Budak Bascift, Z., Sonmez, K., Evrenosoglu, Y., & Kutlu, I. 2014. Kernel Quality of Some Sweet Corn Varieties in Relation to Processing. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici 42:414-419.

Anderson, J., Paulis, J., Porcuna, F., & Wall, J. 1979. Sweet Corn: Varietal and Developmental Difference Amino Acid Content and Composition of Grain. Journal of Food Science 44:836-838.

Campbell, J. D. & Mckerlie, E. M. 1967. The Evaluation of Methods to Determine Sweet Corn Maturity for Processing. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 47:381-387.

Cao, D., Hu, Jhuang, X., Wang, J., Guan, Y., & Wang, Z. 2008. Relationships between changes of kernel nutritive components and seed vigor during development stages of F1 seeds of sh2 sweet corn. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 9:964-968. 137-138 pp.

Dagla, M., Gadag, R., O P , S., & Kumar, N. 2015. Genetic variability and correlation among yield and quality traits in sweetcorn. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 6:500-505.

Dodson, H. G., & Tracy, W. F. (2013). Endosperm Carbohydrate Composition and Kernel Characteristics of shrunken2-intermediate (sh2-i/ sh2-i Su1/Su1) and shrunken2-intermediate–sugary1-reference (sh2-i/sh2-i su1-r/su1-r) in Sweet Corn. PhD Dissertation. The University of Wisconsin Madison.1-8 pp.

Eskin, M. (1989). Quality and preservation of vegetables. Florida, United States: CRC Press.

Goldman, I., & Tracy, W. 1994. Kernel Protein Concentration in sugary-1 and shrunken-2 Sweet Corn. Hort Science 29:209-210.

Johari, Aanchal & Kaushik, Isha. 2016. Sweet corn: New Age Health Food. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research.7:12804-12807.

Jugenheimer, R. (1976). Corn; Improvement, Seed Production and Uses. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Markovic, I., Ilic, J., Markovic, D., Simonovic , V., & Kosanic, N. n.d. Color Measurement of Food Products Using CIE L*a*b* and RGB. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design 4:50-53.

Rodríguez, G. R., Moyseenko, J. B., Robbins, M. D., Huarachi Morejón, N., Francis, D. M., Van Der Knaap, E. (2010). Tomato Analyzer: A Useful Software Application to Collect Accurate and Detailed Morphological and Colorimetric Data from Two-dimensional Objects.J. Vis. Exp. 37, e1856, doi:10.3791/1856.

Szymanek, M. 2009. Influence of Sweet Corn Harvest Date on Kernels Quality.Research in Agricultural Engineering 55 pp. 10-17.

Szymanek, M., Dobrzañski Jr., B., Rybczyñski , R., & Niedziolka, I. (2006). Sweet Corn Harvest and Technology: Physical Properties and Qualities (1st ed.). B. Dobrzañski Institute of Agrophysics Polish Academy of Sciences, pp. 25-30.

Ullah, I., Ali, M., & Farooqi, A. 2010. Chemical and Nutritional Properties of Some Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties Grown in NWFP, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 9 pp. 1113-117.

Ugur, A., & Maden, H. 2015. Sowing and Planting Period on Yield and Ear Quality of Sweet Corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata). Science and Agrotecnologia 39:48-57.

Wong, A., Juvik , J., Breeden, D., & Swi, J. 1994. Shrunken2 Sweet Corn Yield and the Chemical Components of Quality. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science. 119:747-755.




How to Cite

Evangelista, G., & Felix, A. (2020). Physical Characteristics and Proximate Composition of Three Commercial <em>Shrunken 2</em> Varieties of Sweet Corn in the Philippines as Influenced by Harvest Maturity. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 8(5).