The Analysis of Government’s Communications and Public Engagement’s Socio-Political Effects during the Financial Crisis in Latvia (2008 - 2011)

Authors

  • Sandra Veinberg Riga International School of Economics and Business Administration (RISEBA), Faculty of Public Relations and Advertising Management; Senior Researcher at Liepājas universitāte, Institute of Management Sciences

Keywords:

Latvia, European identity, financial crisis, political communication

Abstract

The Baltic States have been amongst the worst hit by the global financial crisis. The most serious situation was experienced in Latvia. The country was forced to ask the International Monetary Fund and the European Union for an emergency bailout of 7.5 billion euros. The 2008-2011 Latvian financial crisis stemmed from the global financial crisis of 2008-2009. The government laid off a third of its civil servants, slashed wages for the rest, and sharply reduced support for hospitals, and for the most part people accepted this bitter medicine.

Negotiations between the government and lenders were constructive and confidential, but the consequences “of the efficient fiscal adjustment†were tragic for too many people in Latvia. Currently, Latvia has been able to stabilise its financial systems, but Latvia’s homework has become a major topic of discussion among various economists. Due to the austerity measures, Latvians were confused and began to emigrate. When the financial crisis was a fact for Latvia, the government did not possess any strategy for communications with the country’s residents. The transmission model for communications (a one-way process) was dominant. National studies of PR show that with the absence of a modern strategy for communications, Latvia has certainly not been an example for other countries that experience an economic crisis.

 

Author Biography

Sandra Veinberg, Riga International School of Economics and Business Administration (RISEBA), Faculty of Public Relations and Advertising Management; Senior Researcher at Liepājas universitāte, Institute of Management Sciences

1. Associate Professor, Riga International School of Economics and Business Administration (RISEBA), Faculty of Public Relations and Advertising Management, Meža iela 3. Riga, LV 1048. Latvia;
2. Senior Researcher at LiepÄjas universitÄte, Institute of Management Sciences. LielÄ iela 14. LiepÄja, LV 3401 Latvia.

References

• Journals:

• Coombs, T. (2009). An Analytic Framework for Crisis Situations: Better Responses From a Better Understanding of the Situation. Public Relations Research. 10. 177-191.

• Hiebert, R. E. (2003). Public relations and propaganda in framing the Iraq war: A preliminary review. Public Relations Review. 29, 243 -255.

• Jorgensen, B. (1994) Consumer reaction to company-related disasters: The effect of multiple versus single explanations, Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 348–352.

• Books:

• Berger, B. (2007). Public relations and organisational power in Toth, E (Eds) The future of excellence and communication management: challenges for the next generation.(pp. 221-234). Festschrift, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

• Brooker, W., Jermyn, D.(2003). It’s out there... somewhere: Locating the audience for the audience studies reader. In Brooker, W., Jeremyn, D. (Eds.). The audience studies reader.(pp.1-11). London: Routledge.

• Coombs, T. (2007). Ongoing crisis communication. Planning, managing and responding. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

• Dozier, D. M. (1995). Manager’s guide to excellence in public relations and communication management. New York : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

• Erikson, P. (1992). Planerad kommunication. Malmö: Liber Ekonomi.

• Fraser, P (1990). Communicating in Crisis. United States Banker. 1990.

• Fink, S. (2002). Crisis management. Planning for the inevitable. Lincoln: Universe Inc.

• Gaunlet, D. (1995). Moving experiences: Understanding television’s influences and effects. London: John Liberty.

• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

• Gilpin, D. & Murphy, P. (2008). Crisis management in a complex world. Oxford: University Press.

• Grange, J. & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

• Habermas, J. (1976). Legitimation crisis. London: Heinemann.

• Harris, T. (1997). Integrated Marketing Public Relations. Caywood, Clarke L. (1997). (Eds.). The Handbook of Strategic Public Relations & Integrated Communications. (pp.90-106). New York: McGraw-Hill.

• Heath, R. (2001). Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications.

• Heath, R. (1997). Strategic Issues Management. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

• Kivikuru, U. & Nord, L. (2009). After the Tsunami. Crisis Communication in Finland and Sweden. Gothenburg: Nordicom.

• Jowett, G., & O’Donnell, V. (1992). Propaganda and persuasion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

• L’Etang, J. (2008). Public Relations. Concepts, Practice and Critique. London: Sage Publications.

• Liu, B., Levenshus, A. (2012). Crisis Public Relations for Government Communicators. In Lee M., Neeley G. & Stewart K. (Eds). The Practice of Government Public Relations. (pp.101 -125). New York: CRC Press.

• Karlöf, B. (2000). Strategins renässans. Stockholm: Ekerlids Förlag.

• Lee, M. (2007). Government Public Relations: A Reader. New York: CRC Press.

• Lee M., &Neeley G. & Stewart K. (2012). The Practice of Government Public Relations. New York: CRC Press.

• McNair, B. (2003). An introduction to political communication. London: Routledge.

• Miller, D. (Eds.) (2003). Tell me lies: Propaganda and media distortion in the attack of Iraq. London: Pluto Press.

• Mohd, H. (2004). Government Public Relations: Persuasion, Personality & Power. Singapore. Asian Public Relations Academy.

• Philpott, D. (2009). Crisis Communications. Longboat Key: Government Training Inc.

• Robins, K. Webster F., & Pickering, M. (1987). Propaganda, information and social control. In Hawthorn J. (Eds.) Propaganda, persuasion and polemic. (pp. 1-17). London : Edward Arnold.

• Seeger, M, Sellnow, T. & Ulmer R. (1998). Communication, organization and crisis. In Roof, M. (Eds.). Communication Yearbook. Vol. 21, p. 233. Thousand Oaks: CA Sage.

• Seger, M., Sellnow, T. & Ulmer, R. (2003). Communication and Organizational Crisis. Westport: Praeger Publichers.

• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Weaver, C., Motion, J.& Roper, J. (2006). From Propaganda to Discourse (and back again). In L’Etang, J., Pieczka, M. (Eds.) Public Relations. Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. (pp. 7-23). Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

• Åslund, A. & Dombrovskis, V. (2011). How Latvia Come through the Financial Crisis. Washington: Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

• Conference Paper:

• Apsīte, E., Krisjane, Z., Berzins, M. (2012). Emigration from Latvia under economic crisis conditions. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Social Science and Humanity IPEDR vol.31 (2012) © (2012) IACSIT Press, Singapore.

• Web Citation:

• Adamsone, A. (2012). Those who change will endure - IMF managing director. Nozare. LV. 05.06.2012, from http://www.leta.lv/eng/home/important/619F6516-7334-4B81-B10C-8D4FA60B09EF/

• Bank of Latvia. (2006). Recent Economic Developments and Banking in Latvia, available online at: [http://www.bank.lv/eng/info/jaunzin/].

• Freeze, T. (2012). Sharing Christ in the Face of Hopelessness. Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. 19.06.2012, from http://www.billygraham.org/articlepage.asp?articleid=8696

• Government Communications and Public Engagement. British Columbia. Canada. http://www.gov.bc.ca/gcpe/

• Rozenberga, G. I. (2013). Lavijas zinÄtnieku atklÄtÄ vÄ“tule. 14.01.2013, www.apollo.lv from http://www.apollo.lv/zinas/latvijas-zinatnieku-atklata-vestule/549058

• Higgins, A. (2013). Used to Hardship, Latvia Accepts Austerity, and Its Pain Eases. New York Times. 01.01.2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/world/europe/used-to-hardship-latvia-accepts-austerity-and-its-pain-eases.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

• Höbermägi, T. (2010). Moody’s: Latvian economy is stabilising. BBN, Aripaev. 08.02.2010. from http://www.bbn.ee/article/2010/02/08/Moody_s_Latvian_economy_is_stabilizing

• Karnite, R. (2006). Emigration of Latvian workers continues to increase. Euroline. 26.01.2006. From http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2005/12/feature/lv0512104f.htm

• Krugman, P. (2008). Latvia is the new Argentina. The New York Times, 23.12.2008. From http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/23/latvia-is-the-new-argentina-slightly-wonkish/

• Morison, O. (2012). The Globe and Mail. 19.06.2012, from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/emerging-from-the-crisis-how-latvia-did-it/article4350263/

• Parry, T. (2009). Europe’s sickest country. CBC News, 26.02.2009, from http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2009/02/26/f-rfa-parry.html.

• Research, commissioned by the State Chancellery at Government of Latvia. (2007). “ValdÄ«bas komunikÄcijas prakses analÄ«ze un rekomendÄcijas tÄs pilnveidoÅ¡anaiâ€. RÄ«ga, SIA AnalÄ«tisko pÄ“tÄ«jumu un stratÄ“Ä£iju laboratorija, from http://nvo.lv/site/uploads/vecie_faili/petijums_valdibas_komunik_pol.pdf

• Sabel, C., O’Rourke, D. & Fung, A. (2000) Ratcheting Labor Standards: Regulation for Continuous Improvement in the Global Workplace. Columbia Law School Working Papers, from http://www2.law.columbia.edu/sabel/papers/ratchPO.html

• The Economist. (2000). Latvian lessons. The Baltics are growing after austerity - and they resent Mediterranean bail-outs. 09.06.2012, from http://www.economist.com/node/21556580

• Weisbrot, M. (2011). Europe’s Crisis and Latvia’s “Successâ€. The Guardian Unlimited. 15.12.2011, from http://www.cepr.net/index.php/op-eds-&-columns/op-eds-&-columns/europes-crisis-and-latvias-success

• World Bank. (2005). Doing Business in 2006:. Press Release, 12 September, World Bank, Washington, DC, from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/ECAEXT/0,,contentMDK:20643520~menuPK:258604~pagePK:146736~piPK:146830~theSitePK:258599,00.html

Downloads

Published

2013-12-14

How to Cite

Veinberg, S. (2013). The Analysis of Government’s Communications and Public Engagement’s Socio-Political Effects during the Financial Crisis in Latvia (2008 - 2011). Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 1(5). Retrieved from https://www.ajouronline.com/index.php/AJHSS/article/view/523

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 5 (2013): December 2013

Section

Articles

License

  • Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
  • It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
  • The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
  • The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  • The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.